<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hamilton Lawyers - Flaherty Sloan Hatfield - Personal Injury Lawyers, Hamilton, Ontario</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flashlaw.ca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flashlaw.ca</link>
	<description>Personal Injury Lawyers in Hamilton, Ontario - When results count.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:28:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More on Scarlett and Belair: Minor Injury Guideline Case Supports Injured Insureds</title>
		<link>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/second-minor-injury-guidline-case-supports-injured-insureds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/second-minor-injury-guidline-case-supports-injured-insureds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 20:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cflaherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashlaw.ca/?p=931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent case of Scarlett v. Belair Insurance Decision Date: 2013-03-26, Adjudicator: John Wilson, Regulation: 34/10, Decision: Arbitration, Preliminary Issue, FSCO 3965 is the first reported Minor Injury Guideline (MIG) case. The gist of the decisions stand for the proposition that injured insureds should not be required to take extraordinary steps, or be forced to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/second-minor-injury-guidline-case-supports-injured-insureds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Minor Injury Giudeline Case Demonstrates Lack of Coverage in Ontario</title>
		<link>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/first-minor-injury-case-demonstrates-lack-of-covereage-in-ontario/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/first-minor-injury-case-demonstrates-lack-of-covereage-in-ontario/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cflaherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashlaw.ca/?p=917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent case of Scarlett v. Belair, FSCO A12-00107, is important more for what it demonstrates in terms of the state of automobile first party insurance benefits in Ontario at the present time, than as an analysis of the application of the Minor Injury Guideline in the legal context. They key factors that support this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/first-minor-injury-case-demonstrates-lack-of-covereage-in-ontario/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New commander for storied Argyll regiment</title>
		<link>http://www.flashlaw.ca/local-events/new-commander-for-storied-argyll-regiment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flashlaw.ca/local-events/new-commander-for-storied-argyll-regiment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cflaherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashlaw.ca/?p=903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Hamilton Spectator The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders of Canada have a new commander. Lieutenant-Colonel Lawrence Hatfield took charge of the regiment in a rainy parade celebration at Bayfront Park Sunday, succeeding Lieutenant-Colonel Gary Sexton. “I’m very privileged today,” Hatfield said. “Our history is time-honoured, written in battle and blood.” The Argyll and Sutherland [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flashlaw.ca/local-events/new-commander-for-storied-argyll-regiment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Justice: Superintendent cloaks policy issue as science on catastrophic impairment</title>
		<link>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/social-justice-superintendent-cloaks-policy-issue-as-science-on-catastrophic-impairment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/social-justice-superintendent-cloaks-policy-issue-as-science-on-catastrophic-impairment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cflaherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashlaw.ca/?p=897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social Justice: Superintendent cloaks policy issue as science on catastrophic impairment Monday, September 10, 2012 &#124; Written by Alan Shanoff &#124; Law Times http://www.lawtimesnews.com/201209109304/Commentary/Superintendent-cloaks-policy-issue-as-science-on-catastrophic-impairment The superintendent’s report on the definition of catastrophic impairment in the statutory accident benefits schedule may seem like a dry topic, but for those suffering injuries in motor vehicle accidents, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/social-justice-superintendent-cloaks-policy-issue-as-science-on-catastrophic-impairment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ontario Government Poised to Make Deep Cuts To Auto Insurance Benefits &#8211; Again</title>
		<link>http://www.flashlaw.ca/industry-news/ontario-government-poised-to-make-deep-cuts-to-auto-insurance-benefits-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flashlaw.ca/industry-news/ontario-government-poised-to-make-deep-cuts-to-auto-insurance-benefits-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cflaherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashlaw.ca/?p=894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TORONTO, June 12, 2012 /CNW/ &#8211; The Ontario government is about to implement another round of cuts to auto insurance benefits, this time slashing coverage for devastating injuries. &#8220;If the government goes ahead with this, it will hurt a lot of very vulnerable people,&#8221; says Nick Gurevich, President of the Alliance of Community Medical and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flashlaw.ca/industry-news/ontario-government-poised-to-make-deep-cuts-to-auto-insurance-benefits-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Many insurers reject requests &#8211; will yours?</title>
		<link>http://www.flashlaw.ca/industry-news/many-insurers-reject-requests-will-yours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flashlaw.ca/industry-news/many-insurers-reject-requests-will-yours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cflaherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashlaw.ca/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.moneyville.ca/article/1167459&#8211;auto-insurers-routinely-deny-treatment-plans-therapists-say By Ellen Roseman &#124; Tue Apr 24 2012 The Toronto Star Suppose you’re driving your car with three passengers and you hit a deer. No one is hurt, except the animal. Your insurance company quickly pays $24,000 to cover repairs to your damaged car. It’s happy to protect you from financial harm after an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flashlaw.ca/industry-news/many-insurers-reject-requests-will-yours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ontario Court Of Appeal Upholds Judgement in Bicycle Case</title>
		<link>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/ontario-court-of-appeal-upholds-judgement-in-bicylce-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/ontario-court-of-appeal-upholds-judgement-in-bicylce-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cflaherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashlaw.ca/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld the judgement in Herbert v. The City of Brantford. The Ontario Court of Appeal decision can be found at http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decisions/2012/2012ONCA0098.pdf Mr. Herbert was injured when he lost control of his bicylce on a pathway owned by the City of Brantford. The pathway was poorly maintained and constructed and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/ontario-court-of-appeal-upholds-judgement-in-bicylce-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Car injury claims increasingly denied</title>
		<link>http://www.flashlaw.ca/industry-news/car-injury-claims-increasingly-denied/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flashlaw.ca/industry-news/car-injury-claims-increasingly-denied/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cflaherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashlaw.ca/?p=858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported by the CBC at http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2011/12/30/car-insurance-therapy.html  Hamilton speech therapist says car insurance companies are increasingly rejecting her recommended treatments for people who’ve been hurt in accidents. Deidre Sperry helps her clients recover from brain injuries. Those who have been hurt in car accidents represent 95 per cent of her client base. Car insurance companies [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flashlaw.ca/industry-news/car-injury-claims-increasingly-denied/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ontario Court of Appeal Favours Desbiens Approach in Catastrophic Injury Determinations</title>
		<link>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/ontario-court-of-appeal-favours-desbiens-approach-in-catastrophic-injury-determinations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/ontario-court-of-appeal-favours-desbiens-approach-in-catastrophic-injury-determinations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cflaherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashlaw.ca/?p=851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Accident victim&#8217;s rights to expansive first party or &#8220;no-fault&#8221; benefits in catastrophic cases has been boosted by the recent decision in Kusnierz v. The Economical Mutual Insurance Company, 2010 ONSC 5749 (CanLII).  The decision overturns the trial decision.  At trial the judge determined that psychological impairments could not be considered in conjunction with physcal impairments [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flashlaw.ca/case-law/ontario-court-of-appeal-favours-desbiens-approach-in-catastrophic-injury-determinations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Litigation looms over minor injury cases</title>
		<link>http://www.flashlaw.ca/industry-news/litigation-looms-over-minor-injury-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flashlaw.ca/industry-news/litigation-looms-over-minor-injury-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cflaherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashlaw.ca/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Law Times at http://www.lawtimesnews.com/Focus-On/Litigation-looms-over-minor-injury-cases Many insurance industry professionals are predicting a deluge of litigation over the many uncertainties associated with the application of the minor injury guidelines. The lack of consensus over which cases legitimately fall within the criteria cries out for judicial commentary that appears to be years away, which means that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flashlaw.ca/industry-news/litigation-looms-over-minor-injury-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
